[Official Topic] - Tactics Request
-
You gotta provide us with more info if you want us to give you a suited setup: style of play; offside trap, marking, where will the match be disputed, squad values and some other info I miss be missing (but that we need to give you proper feedback).
And, oh: welcome back. -
What I meant to say is that you need to tell us more info about your opponent (regarding the Data Analist report) so that we can give a good setup to face such opponent.
-
-
I'll face one today with 4-4-2 B through passing game.
-
So don't you defend with offside trap when playing offensively?
-
@DMFArranhado98 Offside I consider it better when you only have 3 defenses or your defense support midfield
-
This post is deleted!
-
Leave all on position.
-
-
4-5-1
Shoot On Sight
Forward supporting midfield | Midfielders holding position | Defenders defending deep
Zonal marking
No offside trap
Defensive (30) style
High-speed passimg (60-80) tempo -
@DMFArranhado98 thank you and pressing ?
-
@DMFArranhado98 75/30/70 Agressive it’s good ??
-
@jibzoo 39-30-62
Belajar Memang Melelahkan Namun Lebih Melelahkan Lagi Jika Saat Ini Kamu Tidak Belajar!!!
-
I think I never had good results whilst playing with low pressure, but many managers support it. I feel like it's the same as tackling: careful tackling and low pressure just gimme an impression that players don't put enough effort, ending up underperforming.
-
There are other factors to consider besides formations. That's not everything that matters. Style of play and offside trap provide valuable info for us to set up a countering tactic.
So, next time you'll face an opponent playing in such formation, feel free to HMU and we'll work it out. -
I play with offside trap when playing offensively and when my opponent doesn't play through wing play. I play without it when I play defensively and when my opponent doesn't play with shoot on sight.
About marking, I never use man-on-man marking - given all the criticizing I got from post-match commentators whenever I used it. MoM marking should be better when you play with only three defenders and when your opponent plays with more than one forward only - but I never set such a week defense line in cases where that happens.Although, I was talking about reports from the Data Analist, regarding your opponents. I still let you know how I feel about what you asked me now, but, yeah, I felt what you misunderstood what I said before.
I rather set my tactics according to my opponents' ones instead of focusing on setting an undefeatable tactic - which I don't believe there is. -
So what do I have to do when somebody plays through wing play in a 4-3-3 formation, for example?
It'll depend on your team values and on if your opponent defends with offside trap or not.
As I said before, each scenario requires a different approach.Commentaries said, at both of my matches, that my players felt good in this formation and played very well.
This is because you linked your chosen formation to a proper style of play.
Both 4-4-2B PG and 4-5-1 SOS are good setups.They both said my attackers weren't efficient enough, but i had Ronaldo on striker position in a match. I should've won on paper.
Maybe your Ronaldo was still worse than your opponent's defenders.
It's all about relative qualities. It doesn't only take your players to be absolutely good; they gotta be better than their opponents in order to thrive.Is in the crew battle league with Al-Ittihad. So do you have any idea on what went wrong in both matches?
I'm also managing Al-Ittihad on my current battle - and I haven't been to win yet for my first seven matches on the league.
Theory doesn't work all the times.
My squad is the second best on the competition...
... and I still fail at winning matches - despite my better stats on a few matches.
If you visit some official fonts, you'll always see that one of factors to consider regarding OSM simulations is luck. So, you may be on a unlucky streak of two matches... but I'm a lot worse over here.
thanks
