WCC 2016 - Round 3

[carlosastiz]

ROUND 3, GROUP N.

Awaiting confirmation of the rival captain

[mihau1878]

Score is confirmed

[Sosyokrat]

                                               WCC 2016  - Round 3 (Group V)

Final Score

Result confirmed by the opposit captain. Our thanks to MEN OF HONOUR for this excellent battle. :slight_smile:

[J.Shephard]

My thanks and congratulations to our opponents for this amazing and fought battle played with great commitment and fair play

Waiting confirmation by their captain

[leucostin]

Group R - WCC 2016 - Round 3

RO MANIA vs REVENGE:

Final score:

P.S. The result is not confirmed yet.

[Matteo Cappelletti]

@leucostin

The result is confirmed... don't worry.

[J.Shephard]

Good morning guys, I precise that my speech doesn't a polemic purpose, but is intended as a constructive starting point to improve if possible the rules.
Having said that, my thought is that the 1000-0 score for a battle won not playing is too big! In real football the victory is 3-0, I think it's more correct to find a "weighted average" according to the usual final results of the battles or at least I think a result of 300-0 is certainly fairer.
That said congratulations to all qualified groups for the next round and good luck everyone (but especially to Italian crews)

[Lirind]

Thnx for the battle and good luck in the future

All Star Crew: 832
GOF - U23: 1584

http://prntscr.com/e4cnfm

[Ale Oko]

Taverna ISM vs Fat Lords

[Lafuens]

Grupos S. Final Result (Awaiting for confirmation)

Zeitgeist 1560
Lusitanos 840

[Wahyu sigit madridista]

1. First TC : [IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/4hbfwk.jpg[/IMG]

2. Second TC : [IMG]http://i67.tinypic.com/21dfqys.jpg[/IMG]

3. Third TC : [IMG]http://i64.tinypic.com/2djdx52.jpg[/IMG]

4. Fourth TC : [IMG]http://i68.tinypic.com/153np6t.jpg[/IMG]

5. EXTRA TC : [IMG]http://i68.tinypic.com/2wq8y7b.jpg[/IMG]

RULES OF WCC USED ''EXTRA CAMP'' -300pts

[IMG]http://i64.tinypic.com/2a8qp2u.jpg[/IMG]

I Want to Claim -300 PTS for your teams, #Thanks

Round 22/22 Exclude Penalty Extra Camp : [IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/2mealmq.jpg[/IMG]

[b]FINAL SCORE (Include Penalty Extra Camp -300pts) :

OL 304 - PT 1777 : Diff -1473[/b]

*Waiting Confirmation @charlovski

[I Love Niken]

Just resync

@Wahyu-sigit-madridista said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:

1. First TC :

2. Second TC :

3. Third TC :

4. Fourth TC :

5. EXTRA TC :

RULES OF WCC USED ''EXTRA CAMP'' -300pts

I Want to Claim -300 PTS for your teams, #Thanks

Round 22/22 Exclude Penalty Extra Camp :

[b]FINAL SCORE (Include Penalty Extra Camp -300pts) :

OL 304 - PT 1777 : Diff -1473[/b]

*Waiting Confirmation @charlovski

[Lord Supreme]

@J.Shephard said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:

Good morning guys, I precise that my speech doesn't a polemic purpose, but is intended as a constructive starting point to improve if possible the rules.
Having said that, my thought is that the 1000-0 score for a battle won not playing is too big! In real football the victory is 3-0, I think it's more correct to find a "weighted average" according to the usual final results of the battles or at least I think a result of 300-0 is certainly fairer.
That said congratulations to all qualified groups for the next round and good luck everyone (but especially to Italian crews)

I agree, but I think the problem is in the classification decision, it could change the criterion .. Instead of doing for point balance, it could be defined by direct confrontation.

[J.Shephard]

@Lord-Supreme said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:

@J.Shephard said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:

Good morning guys, I precise that my speech doesn't a polemic purpose, but is intended as a constructive starting point to improve if possible the rules.
Having said that, my thought is that the 1000-0 score for a battle won not playing is too big! In real football the victory is 3-0, I think it's more correct to find a "weighted average" according to the usual final results of the battles or at least I think a result of 300-0 is certainly fairer.
That said congratulations to all qualified groups for the next round and good luck everyone (but especially to Italian crews)

I agree, but I think the problem is in the classification decision, it could change the criterion .. Instead of doing for point balance, it could be defined by direct confrontation.

Another problem is the balance of the groups, no critic to the organizers, there isn't currently a reliable rankings to form balanced groups, but while in our and other groups have been played battles fought and very balanced in other groups some crew (with the MAXIMUM respect for ALL crews of course) instead of a battle did a "walk"

[Sawsilvio]

Do not qualify with 1080 points of difference. There are no words

[Adilmo Rocha]

@J.Shephard @Lord-Supreme

Same criteria this CCL.

Next edition we change!

[Angel Sanctis]

@Lafuens Confirmed. Congratulations on the battle!!

[romito61]

[romito61]

[Maio66]

Group A:
The Brotherhood vs. Lotus
[IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/fa5t9j.jpg[/IMG]

confirmed