WCC 2016 - Round 3
-
@Bayram-Karakuş said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
Sorry friends, but without mentioning a few words I cannot. Whether it be a war in wars or for any other reason for failing to exit forfeiting or forfeit teams never welcome that mm is not possible. Then, from the beginning you won't be attending the tournament. What, spend all that time trying all that hard work, do all the thinking for someone else because of the efforts of labor to reflect the time you waste it. It is not a disrespectful thing.
Previously as can be seen above, a certain section of the tournament and then withdrew from the tournament join the tournament, and I don't blame the teams in other groups that can influence the results.
-
@Adilmo-Rocha Thanks for the tournament, I hope in the future there will be other conditions for getting into such a tournament and the risk of irresponsible clan will be less.
-
What penalties, friends? We are talking about a result duly posted more than 2 months ago and that we have incorrectly updated the official worksheet. Only that! We are not looking at penalties that occurred long ago!
-
@Хосе-Валера said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
Thanks for the tournament, I hope in the future there will be other conditions for getting into such a tournament and the risk of irresponsible clan will be less.
I think they're seeing everything wrong. Not a big deal here but a wrong upgrade in the middle of such a tournament! I think there is a lot of effort to make everything go well!
-
So when is the draw??????
-
@Batyr-Myadysoyunov I also waiting draw ?
-
@Adilmo-Rocha said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
Calendar:
06/02 - Draw teams next phase
Until 07/02 - Lineup
08/02 - Start battles -
The draw for when?
-
In this situation a lot of teams won whitout playing, decide to go ahead some crews by points difference is unfair, tournaments owners must consider to change something for wcc loyalty.
-
Hello friends
I don't know how effective it is these comments and my thoughts, but wanted to mention it anyway.
First, Thank you to the tournament organizer and the contributors.
The next tournament to be held in remand and a new application scores in the defeat in the War, I believe it should be.
During the fight, in scores of war criminal to score any team's score at the end of the league, even though do not fall below zero should not be so sour
By default 1000-0 500-0 concluded that instead of Defeat, I am.
Hopefully a team in the tournament better next upcoming issues evaluated is passed to the application.
Best regards -
I know you missed the spot, but I wanted to make it clear to you.
In his group I, DIEGO defeated AY YILDIZ TEAM by W.O. (1000 x 0) while his group won by 2102 x 367 and Spartacus Legends won by 1898 x 567
Those who took damage in this was the DIEGO group that had the lowest balance:
Karadeniz Imparatorlugu = 1735
Spartacus Legends = 1331
DIEGO = 1000As for the other groups that have passed as second best placed, I highlight here those who had WO.
Group V: Men Of Honor beat Black-WOLF by W.O. (1000 x 0) ... AKINCILAR won by 1747 x 290
AKINCILAR = 1457 balance
Men Of Honor = 1000Group F: Arab Crew defeated Nawabs of Bengal by W.O. (1000 x 0) ... The Phoenix won by 2284 x -1303
The Phoenix = 3587
Arab Crew = 1000That is, in most cases, the W.O. It is harmful to who wins, because history shows it would be possible to win by more points than the 1000 x 0.
What determined the entrance of Lusitanos was not the W.O of 500 x 0 against THE 1ST, but rather the victory over Champions of America (Platinum Warriors) by 1933 x -546 (Balance of 2479). If Lusitanos won by W.O. (1000 x 0), would be out of the classification!
Looking at all this, the results from W.O. Were not responsible for classifying any group! On the contrary, if you had beaten AY YILDIZ TEAM by WO as it was with DIEGO and Spartacus Legends, they would be far from qualifying!
I consider this matter closed!
For the next issue, let's look at everything and make the changes that really are needed!
-
We got the long-awaited phase direct battles! From now on, lost is out!
We list all classified crews and split them into 2 pots (1st to 16th and 17th to 32th), according to their scores.
Then we make simple draws: POT I to align the HOME and POT II groups to align your opponents. The screens of the draw are here:
http://prntscr.com/e587pk
http://prntscr.com/e587zx
http://prntscr.com/e58b1r
http://prntscr.com/e58bdtThus, we have the clashes of the Last 32:
Lineups should be posted by tomorrow, 07/02 (midnight server), with captain and moderator!
Let's play in Australia, according to the draw below:
Doubts, I am at your disposal! Good luck to all groups !!!
-
@Adilmo-Rocha said in WCC 2016 - Round 3:
We list all classified crews and split them into 2 pots (1st to 16th and 17th to 32th), according to their scores.
-
@Adilmo-Rocha
Mate, my suggestion for you.
Next year remove this system with ''best runner-up's''. This makes unnecessary problems and controversy. For example we won vs Zeitgeist 50 points difference, but some crews won +2000 difference vs amateur crews. With this system, it looks like this win vs amateur crews worth more than a win in a very tight and hard battle. Think about that.
The usually rule that 2 first placed crews go into the next round is very simple and clear and removes all speculations. Also very important, it is fair.