Divisions - Discussion/Questions....

HP1Life

The main issue here is the devaluation of the ranking of management points. In my opinion it is very inconsistent that a ranking that was already fixed in the game and that several coaches dreamed of it being replaced by a new ranking. I am sure that the vast majority of players who are present here in the forum want the two rankings to be maintained, so that all coaches can have their needs and goals met.

Márcio Girilim Santos

@hblauzahn said in Divisions - Discussion/Questions....:

@specialone You say members of support don't have the time to watch out for the cheats every day.
Then please form a task force now in the course of the changeover to the medals that will seriously deal with finding and blocking these cheaters. When the task force has done its job, only then will you get a fair ranking. If you don't do that, you are supporting these cheaters.
We as managers who love and intensively play this game feel like the real cheats.

The problem is not only the cheaters but also the system adopted in this ranking. Make the four slots counting to the ranking it's a problem to all good players

Restimat

Of course guys, but I have the feeling sure that 95% of the people would act exactly the same if they were at the place of GB ^^
We shouldn't be fools, past is past and there's a main huge silent community who talks by playing, and GB knows what they like and how to enlarge its community. Not pretty sure that having a limited amount of loyal followers is better and more profitable than talking to masses in our digital era... Anyway, that's just my own perception.

In any case, let's focus on change since it's what is required for the game to work and make profit, but at least change it as best as possible ! Let's rise the constructive issues, give correct feedbacks. Some things might be changed, but some will not.
Medals system is great...only if well done, and crowds of people are rightly criticizing some parts of it -not just raging.

Only with a healthy discussion would we be able, perhaps, to gain some positive changes and a fairer working system !

HP1Life

@jeffro-davies

I very much agree with what you say.

I don't understand how all the changes made by the OSM cause so much confusion in the forums, since according to the staffs, surveys are done for everything. There is a lack of communication from staffs and organizers, a lack of commitment to make these researches reach all of us. Since, as we have seen in recent months, the vast majority of players on this forum do not agree with the decisions made by GB.

xXSpeedKill

@restimat

I do not agree ... we have a duty to fight for what we defend ... you are defending that we simply accept everything that imposes on us

timilic7

@SpecialOne

HI.

First of all, I would like to keep the coaching points because they represent a lot of time, money and passion invested over the years by many players of which I am part ....

Then it would be enough for the medal ranking to take into account only the open championships at least finished those who are first with 4 closed accounts against the bot ..

That this one does not concern All accounts at least we could continue to play osm duels or high championships while having a chance in the ranking of the medals.

And finally that the defeats are less penalizing because 2 defeats for divisions 9 and 10 lose more medals than a title brings back, which makes the majority of the top ranked players want to play only against the computer, without spending coins, neither in recruitment, nor in training camp, nor in friendly ....
Look at the French top 10 medals for example, 8 or 9 of the first 10 play 4 closed championships against computers .. Few coins spent and we gradually go up to medals with 0 defeats ..

When it comes to divisions, yes we can be division 10 by playing competitions, so am I. But we cannot be top 50 c is impossible .. So what is the use of the ranking if by playing the competitions offered by the game I can't reach the heights there? If there is a classification I would like to have the chance to be well there, I am talking about the classification not of the divisions, by playing my favorite game. Whereas today, we have to play closed championships against the computer to be at the top nationally or globally .....

On a championship of 10 teams without a cup for simplicity, 2 players divisions 10

A player than against the computer: 18 victories, 0 defeats and maximum 30 coins in recruitment spent. Result:
18 wins * 50 or so medals against the computer plus a bonus of 1000 title medals = 1900 medals to win for, I repeat, maximum 30 coins spent.

One player open championship
14 wins
4 losses
14 * 200 medals maximum = 2800 medals
Champion bonus: 1,500 medals
So over 4300 medals. But I lost 4 * 2000 so 8000 medals for my defeats ... I ended up with less-3700 medals !!!!!!!!
And at least 300 coins spent on recruiting, friendships, training camp !!

And I'm not talking about osm duels if I lose 4 out of 10 games .....

It would also be a very good idea that the OSM DUEL do not bring back or lose any medals. That the medals are not awarded for the OSM duels.

So invite the first 150 in the medal ranking to go to the WC, half will refuse because they would lose matches and therefore go down considerably in the world or national ranking.

I hope you read me... I love this game but...

timilic7

@SpecialOne

Sorry, For more clarity:

Hi

At first I would like to keep the coaching points because they represent a lot of time, money and passion invested for years by many players of which I am a part ...
Then it would be enough for the medal classification to take into account only the OPEN championships.
At least, finished with those who are first thanks to 4 accounts closed against the bot.
That this one does not concern all the accounts, at least we could continue to play osm duels or championships raised while having a chance in the classification of the medals.
And finally, that the defeats are less penalizing because 2 defeats for divisions 9 and 10 lose more medals than a title brings back, which makes the majority of the high-ranked players want to play only against the 'computer, without spending corners, neither in recruitment, nor in training courses, nor in friendly ...
Look at the French top 10 medals for example, 8 or 9 of the top 10 play 4 closed championships against computers ...
Few coins spent and we gradually rise to medals with 0 losses.
As for the divisions, yes we can be division 10 by playing competitions, I am too .. But we cannot be top 50 it's impossible .. So what is the use of the classification if by playing the competitions proposed by the game I can not reach the top? If there is a classification, I would like to have the chance to appear well there, I speak well of the classification not of the divisions, by playing my favorite game. Whereas today, it is necessary to play closed championships against the computer to be at the top nationally or globally .....

On a 10-team championship without a cup for simplicity, let's say 2 players from division 10:

One only plays against the bot: 18 wins, 0 losses and a maximum of 30 coins in recruitment spent. Result:
18 victories * 50 medals approximately against the computer, plus a bonus of 1000 medals for the title = 1900 medals to win, for I repeat, maximum 30 coins.

Another plays open championship,
14 wins 4 losses.
14 * 200 medals maximum = 2800 medals.
Champion bonus: 1,500 medals.
So over 4300 medals. But I lost 4 * 2000 so 8000 medals for my defeats ... I ended up with less -3700 medals !!!!!!!!
And at least 300 coins spent on recruitment, friendships, training camps !!

And I'm not talking about osm duels if I lose 4 out of 10 games .....

It would also be a very good idea for OSM DUELS not to bring back or lose any medals. That medals not be awarded for duels.
So invite the first 150 in the medal ranking to do the WC, half will refuse because they would lose matches and therefore go down considerably in the world or national ranking.

Ochowiak

I'm really happy with the huge amount of players' feedback, which is great, unless the Administration doesn't even read it, that would suck, huh? I think there is one huge thing that wasn't mentioned.
While the managers that are classified by the Divisons system as "THE BEST" play all four slots in full, inactive leagues grinding points, those really great managers compete against other fantastic managers in either Crew Battles or custom tournaments like CCW. It's easy to understand, that those first ones need close to no skill to reach that top and they give no effort in that, while competitive players have to face real opponents that are active, that think and analyse the tactics and that won't let you win easily.
For a quick comparison - @tristan1982 is the best manager in Poland according to manager points, frequently reaching top places in tournaments and crew battles, while in the Divisions bs system he is around 50th place. That's absolutely ridiculous!
What I think may be a good way out of this situation is getting rid of this division non sense and mastering the previous system. Afaik, the Manager points are summed up points from all the leagues played on that very slot during previous 5 years, later results are erased (i'm not 100% sure). What can be done to present a better view on the managers' levels is to shorten the time from 5 years to 2 or even 1.

wakil isco

Of course I am against skipping training points, but I suggest running the game when you are defeated
Matches The medals do not decrease much and when you win they increase and I suggest that there should be more than 10 levels

xXSpeedKill

@ochowiak

I've never seen such unanimity on an osm issue

jeffro davies

@xxspeedkill said in Divisions - Discussion/Questions....:

@ochowiak

I've never seen such unanimity on an osm issue

I have, this is the 3rd time and each time the forums have come alive. Still the same outcome each time.

Old/Classic battles
Timers and BC compensation in app battles
Manager points

It’s inevitable what’s going to happen with manager points regardless of what gets posted here and our feedback. I could write an essay but I won’t bother. My last questions have gone unanswered. Just hide behind the word “surveys”.

I’m starting to think of surveys as real as Santa Claus or the tooth fairy right about now

You would get more respect if you just said what everyone knows. All 3 of them on that list has one thing in common. You think or know that people will spend more boss coins. Nothing to do with making the game better. Simple as that!

xXSpeedKill

if you are not in agreement with these situations you can contact Gamebasics through this email :

info@gamebasics.nl

JerryADS

@specialone Hidden survey, for only 2 or 3 people to answer, because they know that many of us would not agree, and that goes against their interests. You don't even remember what the questions were. When dealing with an important topic, at least review or show the exact data, and don't go assuming what the "questions" were saying.

Vinayak Singh Mehra

@ialeksandari said in Divisions - Discussion/Questions....:

@SpecialOne Many things need to be improved with Medals, but I need to fokus on one big, and that's -medals for loses with clubs with low objective
If I take club with objective 16, and loss aggainst club with objective 1, I can't lose 1000+ medals, it's fair let's say 50, 60..
if you understand what i mean

And,
update is your thing, i mean, not for players to work on, but if you put something in the game, it need's to be near perfection, not at the begining
All of this is cirkus, update this, delete that, remove this, remove that

That's what I posted a month ago, and I agree! Totally nonsense! Now those who'll play with a weaker team will have lesser medals, and finding a top team is very hard and we all know that.

Vinayak Singh Mehra

It's just a game though, but manager points are no joke. Support the movement with using- #BringBackManagerPoints #JusticeForOldPlayers #MPAreBetterThanMedals #MakeOSMGreatAgain #SaveOSM

Vinayak Singh Mehra

Guys I've come up with a survey, please check it and answer your opinions.
https://forms.gle/zdr9FqoQCTVuQpJE7

Rafelmaz

A question for all of you guys:
Would you be willing to pay a monthly or annual fee to the game owner to play by the rules that are most suitable for those who play professionally?
For example, How much does it costs to create a championship? 250-300 coins on average, would you be willing to pay 750 coins to create a championship that can be used for a classic battles? would you be willing to pay an additional annual fee to access the creation of these leagues?
Would you pay the owner of the game to keep both systems, medals and MP?

I work for a Bank, I know business is important, and I can understand that who put money in this business want to have his economical return. Times are changed and it's not possible to play free anymore.
Would you pay to keep the game as 2/3 years ago?

Vinayak Singh Mehra

@vinayak-singh-mehra said in Divisions - Discussion/Questions....:

Guys I've come up with a survey, please check it and answer your opinions.
https://forms.gle/zdr9FqoQCTVuQpJE7

I've removed the feature of logging in so everybody can access to this survey now.

IAleksandarI

@rafelmaz Well this is not a bank, this is a game, if they don't know how to run a profitable game with just ads and from some addict to game dude's that are willing to pay real cash from time to time, then they just need to end this game, and not to destroy it with something that most of the players doesn't like.

timilic7

@rafelmaz

This has no relation because what is set up allows to be well classified in the ranking of medals by playing closed championships against the computer .. So without recruiting, without transfer, and without friendlies ... therefore without spending coins .... While to be at the top of the coaching points ranking I have to recruit a lot and set up training camps for example ...